AIACV: Working for Your Success

Bruce Monighan head shot

I am not sure how many of our members know that the AIACV has been participating with Region Builders since the Spring to advocate for a regional uniformity in public planning and building policy as well as specific changes in individual jurisdictions.

The Chapter has been proactive in the last 10 years in public policy interaction through the City of Sacramento Development Oversight Commission, individual member interaction with elected officials and with staff contacts, and while these efforts have been largely successful we have found resources of time and budget limited.  Early this year Region Builders was formed as a collaboration of developers, builders, contractor’s engineers and architects to help forge public policy direction and create a positive business environment for the design and construction industry.

While we recognized the potential for philosophical conflicts with a collaborative group like this we felt that the potential upside was too significant to not be a participant.  It was really a case of “be at the table or be on the menu”.  We felt it was better to be in a proactive position influencing the future of the region than being the “meal”.

The last few months have seen an amazing series of accomplishments by Region Builders and our influence of the policy agenda and the discussion continues to significant and productive.  Please put Region Builders website, www.regionbuilders.com on your list of favorites and stay tuned for continued good news.  And if the questions comes up “what is the AIA doing for me” point that person to the Region Builders website right after you point them to www.aiacv.org.

AIACV, working for your success

 Bruce Monighan, AIA
2011 President

“Insight” features Capitol Mall Competition

Banner_530x120b

Jeffrey Callison, host of the Capitol Public Radio program “Insight” interviewed AIACV members Kris Barkley, AIA and Bill Crouch, AIA regarding the recently launched Capitol Mall Competition.

Click here to listen.

Please note…it’s the third item of discussion, but worth waiting for!

Is your firm entering the competition? Click here for full details.

In Memory of Dean Unger, FAIA

dean-unger

On Tuesday, July 5, 2011, Dean F. Unger passed away at his home in El Macero, CA, surrounded by his family. The Chapter sends our regards and warm thoughts to his family, friends and colleagues.

A memorial is set for 10:30 A.M., this Saturday, July 16, 2011, at the Veterans Memorial Center, 203 E 14th Street, Davis, CA. In lieu of flowers, donations can be made to Yolo Hospice, 1909 Galileo Court, Suite A, Davis, CA 95618.

*   *   *

Dean Frederick Unger, son of Charles Frederick Unger and Velma Wyatt Unger, was born in Sutter Hospital in Sacramento on December 23, 1928. Dean Was 82

Dean’s early development began in Sacramento’s Curtis Park where he attended Bret Harte Grammar School. He had a black cocker spaniel, Rastus, that he loved and showed in the Sacramento Dog Show. Dean clearly recalled riding in a rowboat down the street with two best friends during a flood in Curtis Park in the early 1930’s.

From Bret Harte Grammar School, Dean advanced to the California Junior High School and then to McClatchy High School, where he played football and was the Student Body President. After graduation from high school, Dean attended the University of California-Berkeley (CAL).

Dean’s father, Charles F. Unger, graduated from Ames College in Iowa and was an architect in his early career. He started a highly respected construction firm, Unger Construction Company, in Sacramento, California. His father’s dedication to the building industry greatly influenced Dean to enroll in the University of California Architecture program. At CAL Dean joined his brother, Wyatt, a student of Engineering, who had recently returned from World War II after serving with the Navy “CB’s” in Okinawa.

Architecture proved to be the path to happiness for Dean and the year 1950 proved to be a landmark year. This year marked the acceptance of his marriage proposal to Peggy and his acceptance to be one of ten members to attend the Architectural Graduate School at UC Berkeley.

Upon Dean’s graduation from CAL with a Master of Arts in Architecture, he volunteered to serve in the Air Force during the Korean War. He took a battery of tests and qualified to be a Second Lieutenant. After basic training at Lackland Field in Texas, Dean was sent to Patrick Air force Base (a support facility for the Infant Missile Test Program at Cape Canaveral). At the end of the war, Dean returned to Sacramento to work as a draftsman for two fine men, Ken Rickey and Fred Brooks; Their stewardship helped define the ethical importance that is so meaningful to the practice of Architecture.

In 1959, Dean made the decision to become a sole practitioner by establishing Dean F. Unger, AIA, Inc. With his wife, Peggy, and their three children, Evan, Lynne and Bruce, Dean developed a loyal clientele. His relationship with long-time local residents and the outstanding reputation of his father (Charles Frederick Unger) and his brother (Wyatt Unger) helped him build his business.

While growing his company, Dean became active in local circles. He served as President for the Central Valley Chapter of The American Institute of Architects. He was also a member of the Sacramento City Housing Appeals Board, and a member of the first Sacramento County Parks and Recreation Commission; this commission coined the name “Discovery Park” and started the American River Parkway right-of-way. Dean served on the Crocker Art Gallery Advisory Board, as well. During his terms of public service, Dean’s Architectural practice grew and produced award-winning designs.

The high-point of his professional service came when State of California Governor, Ronald Reagan, appointed Dean to the State Board of Architectural Examiners’. Dean sat on the board for twelve years, serving four years as Board President. During that period, California was producing more architects than any other state. As President, Dean Unger, signed more “Certificates” for architects than anyone in the world, a feat of which he was very proud.

In 1982, Dean was awarded a Fellowship in the American Institute of Architects by his peers. During his tenure on the State Board of Architectural Examiners, and as a member of the National Council of Architectural Registration Board, and as a Fellow of the American Institute of Architects, Dean chaired the group to formulate the National Architect Design Exam, as well as the “Exam for General Knowledge of the Practice of Architecture” during the 1970’s.

Up until a month before his death, Dean continued to practice architecture through his company. The firm, which has been in business for over fifty years, has earned over 40 Design Awards. Dean F. Unger, AIA has over 2,000 successful design and construction projects to its credit. Some of Dean Unger’s most notable work included: the Yolo county Administration Center in Woodland, the Tuolomne County administration Building in Sonora, the Teichert Corporate Headquarters, the Point West Executive Park and the Farm Credit Banks in Sacramento, the Gold River Executive Center in Gold River, the Aspen Neighborhood, 5th & G Plaza, the UC Davis Faculty Club and the Veteran’s Memorial Building in Davis. Before his death he had been actively planning and designing a multi-use project to be built on family held acreage along the Sacramento River in West Sacramento’s Bridge District.

Dean’s younger son, Bruce F. Unger, AIA, a graduate of UC Berkeley Architecture Program, has served as CEO of Dean F. Unger, AIA, Inc. for the last 10 years. Under the leadership of Bruce F. Unger, the firm continues Dean’s legacy of design excellence.

Dean co-founded the Sudwerk Brewery in Davis in 1990, it has received many national and international awards over the years for its outstanding beer, including just recently another Gold Medal for its craft Pilsner at the 2011 California State Fair.

Dean was incredibly fortunate to combine his love of work and family. Besides working alongside his son Bruce for over 30 years, he partnered with his daughter Lynne Unger Yackzan in multiple development projects for 25 years and mentored and invested in his eldest son’s, Evan C. Unger M.D.’s Tucson, Arizona based Biotechnology Companies. In recent years he worked with several of his grandchildren on various design, development and brewing projects.

Dean was affectionately known by his family as “Granddaddy”. Some of his most cherished moments were with his family, especially his grandchildren, fishing trips with family and friends and his visits to his home at Lake Tahoe.

Dean is survived by his wife of 59 years, Peggy Unger, his children, Evan C. Unger (Susan), Lynne Unger Yackzan (Randy) and Bruce F. Unger (Lisa) and his eleven grandchildren, Wyatt, Heather, Lucy, and Bryan Unger, Lisa Yackzan Herrington (Gregg), Kimberly (Kenneth), Trenton, and Scott Yackzan and Dean, Adam and Emelia Unger.

 

 

Navigating Through ADA Compliance in Hospitals

Member firm Stafford King Wiese is sponsoring an ADA course entitled: “Navigating Through ADA Compliance in Hospitals”. The seminar covers building code issues, OSHPD approvals, handicap compliance and remodeling projects all within an operational hospital.

Program Objectives

Five Steps to Scoping a Hospital Remodel Project
Strategies that Will Save You Time and Money
OSHPD Accessibility Interpretations – CAN 2-11B
Lessons Learned and Case Studies
New 2010 ADAAG Standards

About the presenter

Bill Zellmer, AIA, CASp, LEED Green Associate

Bill is a licensed architect and an accessibility and building code interpretation specialist with over 25 years experience. Prior to joining Stafford King Wiese Architects, Bill was a plan checker for 12 years for OSHPD with a primary focus on handicap accessibility. He is the co-author of CAN 2-11B (OSHPD’s interpretation of accessibility requirements).

Toward the end of Bill’s tenure at OSHPD, he transferred to the OSHPD Codes and Regulations unit, where he was the primary contact for all code interpretation and was responsible for writing code amendments and interpretations. Bill served as the OSHPD representative to the California Building Standards Commission (CBSC) which is the State Agency that oversees the Code Adoption process. At the CBSC, Bill coordinated directly with his counterparts at DSA, HCD, Cal Fire, and CBSC as well as representatives from the building design and construction industries to recommend code language changes and ultimately adoption into the current California Building Code.

Date: Wednesday, July 20, 2011
Location: North Ridge Country Club
7600 Madison Avenue
Fair Oaks, CA 95628

Time: 10:30 Registration and Networking
11:00 -2:00 Presentation
(lunch will be provided)

questions?

Contact Karen Carr at 916.930.5900
or karen_carr@skwaia.com

Program Sponsored by:
Stafford King Wiese Architects

Call for Papers Architecture: Education, Practice and Research; 2012

Submitted by Kanta Jasmine, Assoc. AIA

The Department of Architecture in Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET)
is the first formal institution to impart Architectural education in Bangladesh.

The creation of a new faculty of Architecture and Planning in BUET fifty years ago in 1962 was instrumental in filling
a professional vacuum and it’s opening had spurred significant changes in the development of the country. On the occasion of the celebration of ’50 years of Architecture in Bangladesh’ an International Seminar on ‘Architecture: Education, Practice and Research’ has been organized to mark the new direction that architecture has taken in Bangladesh with the starting of formal institutional education in Architecture at BUET.

Submissions of paper in architecture and related disciplines are invited from architects, engineers, artists, educationists, graduate students, theorists, and researchers. Interested authors may submit papers in all areas of architecture, related to education, practice and research.

For full details click here.

 

Small Firm? Need Leverage? Read This!

Bruce Monighan head shot

April President’s Message
Submitted by Bruce Monighan, AIA

The AIA has established a Small Firm Roundtable to address issues and needs of small firms, something that most of us feel is long overdue. Statistically 85% of all firms in the country are 10 or less and the total is 91% when you count firms up to 20.  Clearly this is the biggest constituency the AIA Institute has.

This will be a bottom-up, grass roots discovery process generated by small firms from across the country.  This collaboration of practioners will begin to collect needs, issues and best practices from other small firms from next door and throughout the country. The process will result in better integration of small firm needs in Institute policies, committees and Knowledge Groups and in tangible benefits to you as a member of the AIA.

Architects are independent by nature and small firms have both strengths and weaknesses, but mostly they lack leverage and are challenged by the costs of operations.  However, with the collaboration of other members, especially those that share common experiences and need, we can as members, leverage our small firms into a better way to do business and in a more cost efficient practice model.

Currently we are using a model description of small firms that defines a firm of 10 or less and includes sole practitioners.  Certainly firms a bit bigger than this would also benefit from the groups’ work but this is directed to helping the smallest of firms be successful and competitive, and maybe even making more money than you have in the past.

The initial work of this group of small practitioners is to “Leverage the advantages of the small firm. We intend to do that concentrating on the following areas:

  • Get the word out – How to effectively and cost efficiently market the firm with traditional methods and social media. How to use social media as viral pubic relationship tool.  How to increase the visibility of your firm using public agency and community outreach.
  • Control the exposure – What are best practice business models, what are current contract models and needs, how to find and use attorneys and accountants, how to minimize the cost of insurance, and what are useful internal control measures.
  • Resource optimization.  We all duplicate resources; people, computers, software, certifications, and documents to name a few.  The cost of being everything to everybody is not sustainable and keeping computer hardware and software at times is prohibitively expensive.  This area will develop a process wherein resources can be shared for overhead reduction, temporary expertise added to your firm and the ability to market different projects using teamed expertise.  You will also be able to market your unique and special services or certifications you have to other small firms. We are also anticipating a forum where questions can be posted on your practice needs and concerns and have them answered by your peers that are experts in various areas.
  • Knowledge access – It is apparent that the Institute and its’ members are a vast repository of information and knowledge.  However it is hard to find and sort though with limited time and resources.  The group is going to find information and resources of value specifically to small firms, categorize it and make it easily searchable and selectable based on market and firm needs and house it in a specific small firm forum.

There are two initial AIA small firm resources that you need to be aware of.  The first resource is the Small Project Practitioners and it generates, collects and disseminates knowledge and wisdom on how to profitably run a small firm and how to carry out small projects that do not fit into the model of departmental production that characterizes many larger firms.  They can be accessed at  http://network.aia.org/AIA/SmallProjectPractitioners/Home/Default.aspx

The second is a web address for the AIA Small Firm Roundtable where you can stay in touch with these projects as they develop.  You need to put on your list of favorites: www.aia.org\sfrt

I believe that in any organization participation is the key to value received but we in this working group intend to make sure the process demands little time from you and is easily accessible, directly relational to your small firm needs and “live” information that changes based on the business climate.

We will be establishing a Small Firm Group here at the AIACV and I invite you all to join and contribute and if not at least check the Chapter website for updates of good ideas and tips.

As always, push the COMMENT button and talk back.  I would like your feedback on this program and any specific needs you want addressed in the process.

Hot tip – Go to www.houzz.com.  If you do residential work this is a place you can post your profile and examples of your work.  The public can then use ideas posted to create their “scrapbook” of ideas and wants for their home using your work as idea inspiration.  When they get ready to do a project they have your name and number.   Can’t hurt, free advertising, gets your name out there.  As other good site are identified that can benefit the small firm we will be passing those along to you.

Are We Still Mentoring?

Bruce Monighan head shot

by Bruce Monighan, AIA
2011 Chapter President

Mentor – a wise and trusted counselor or teacher, an influential senior sponsor or supporter.

Most of us that have been in the profession have had mentors that made a difference in how we handle ourselves, the value we put on our profession and the quality of the work that we do.  Some of that was structured and some of that was done with a more personal focus.  We benefited from this “‘internship”— this grooming of our perceptions and responses.

Architecture is a very experiential profession.  The more years we have in, the more exposure to problems, people and solutions we gain.  The environment for today’s profession is clearly different based on technology.  How work gets designed and produced may be different but we still deal with the needs and expectations of clients and the public.

So the questions is: “Are we still mentoring? Are we still acting like wise and trusted counselors helping to bring along great professionals?” In this I do not mean IDP or other structured “check the box” learning, but real one-on-one interaction.

If you are in the Emerging Professional category, where are you getting your professional support?  Your office? Another architect? Your peer groups? Seminars?  What do you think would be the most valuable for you and your path in the profession?

For those of you “rich in experience” have you been grooming others in the past?  Have you been forced to do it in the last few years based on this economy? I am interested in knowing if structure programs have been set aside and casual programs still exist or have become more prevalent.

Mentoring is also a two-way street.  We of “experience” can learn a lot from a different generation: communication techniques, social networking as a viral marketing tool, being a virtual group where physical presence is not necessary.  Personally for me working on the chapter’s website committee last year was one of those defining opportunities for learning something new from a perspective that should have been foreign to me.

So we can teach each other. We can help the profession grow and keeps the lineage flowing.  Question is…are we?  Are those that need it getting it?  Are those of us capable of mentoring doing it?

Tell me what you think… comment below.

What do you want from your AIA?

Bruce Monighan head shot

President’s Message: Bruce Monighan, AIA
2011 AIACV Chapter President

It is that time of year again when people are asking, “Can I afford it?”, and “What I am getting from my dues?”  Yes, it is that membership cost/value equation.

The traditional retort is that you “only get back what you put in.” But frankly not everybody wants to volunteer or participate—and that is ok.  So there should be another way of looking at this.  For those of us on the Board, making decisions on what programs to pursue, what benefits to try and bring forward and how to define a budget (that is not only balanced but valuable to membership) needs to factor in a key ingredient….you and what you want

So I am looking for just a bit of participation here, a one shot deal maybe.  Tell me what you want for your money, or time, or both.

We represent a very divergent group in age, professional status, employment status and geography.  Making it work for everybody is challenging but I believe we can do better.    Our new website was a step in that direction.  With this message you can talk to me, your chapter’s leadership and your colleagues by adding your comments below this post and telling us your thoughts.  The website is now offering pictures of events and will be offering more programs on video.  We have experimented with a few video postings and are moving toward complete programs on line.  It would allow those outside of the immediate area to participate in architectural and educational activities.  Technology will allow us a lot of connectivity and we want to use that in the best manner possible.

I believe it is an important function of a professional membership to help members, especially now.   If you are not employed or underemployed how can we be of help?

If you are you in the licensing process (or deciding not to follow that line) how can we help, and what do you need to succeed professionally?

If you are a downsized office looking for a foothold in the “new normal” what do you need?  Small firm roundtables, employment of legal direction, marketing ideas or techniques?

With your feedback we can tailor the chapter’s activities to your needs and then when you look at that dues invoice you will know that membership is a good idea.  You might even find yourself in a committee or at a program that sparks your professional interest.

Add your comment below and click “post”. Talk back–we are listening.